Summary
Personal Information
Transportation
William Hall was transported on the Indian, departing 30th Jun 1810 and arriving 16th Dec 1810 with 201 passengers.
Indian (generic)References
| Primary Source | Australian Joint Copying Project. Microfilm Roll 87, Class and Piece Number HO11/2, Page Number 13 (8) |
| Source Description | This record is one of the entries in the British convict transportation registers 1787-1867 database compiled by State Library of Queensland from British Home Office (HO) records which are available on microfilm as part of the Australian Joint Copying Pro |
| Original Source | Great Britain. Home Office |
| Compiled By | State Library of Queensland |
| Database Source | British convict transportation registers 1787-1867 database |
Claims
No one has claimed William Hall yet.
Photos
No photos have been added for William Hall.
Convict Notes
NSW Convict Index. William Hall, per Indian, 1810, Conditional Pardon, 31 Jan 1816. Renewed 10 Oct 1825, having deposed this to be lost. William Hall, per Indian, 1810, Conditional Pardon, 10 Oct 1825, No 113. in lieu of T of L No 726.
HO-11-2. Indents, Early Convict Ships Indian William Hall, Tried at Bedford Assizes, 4 Aug 1808, Life. ----------------------------------------------------------------- Bedford Assizes. The assizes at Bedford commenced Friday se’nnight The calendar, usual in that county, was but thin; only four prisoners. The following trial excited considerable interest. William Hall was capitally indicted for highway robbery near Dunstable, on the 9lh of April last. The Rev. Mr. Horseman, the prosecutor, stated, that he and his wife were driving one horse chaise, within a mile and a half of Dunstable, they were stopped by two footpads. The tallest of the two presented a pistol, and, with horrid oaths and dreadful threats, demanded their watches and money. If they refused, he said, he would blow their brains out. The prosecutor immediately gave his watch and purse, containing about 35.£. when the same man began to rifle Mrs. H. and threatened to kill her if she did not deliver her trinkets. The prosecutor could not swear to the prisoner; but Mrs. Horseman, after corroborating her husband’s evidence, with great agitation and reluctance, identified the prisoner as one of the two, and he who behaved with most civility. The morning after the robbery, the prisoner was apprehended, and, on seeing him, she immediately recognised him. Bell’s Weekly Messenger, 14 Aug 1808.