Summary
Personal Information
Voyage
Transportation
Nicholas Kelly was transported on the Kinnear, departing 10th Jul 1842 and arriving 23rd Oct 1842 with 174 passengers.
Built 1834 at Yarmouth. Wood barque of 369 Tons. (Register of persons transported is not yet completed - currently being listed.) 1842 Voyage. OCT. 23. - Arrived the barque Kinnear, Lidderdale master, from Dublin 10th July, with 180 male prisoners, Surgeon Superintendent - G. J. Fox, Esq. The guard consists of Captain Bull (with Mrs. Bull, 4 children, and 1 female servant), and 30 rank and file of the 99th Regt., - 4 women, and 6 children. Colonial Times (Hobart) 25 Oct 1842.
Kinnear (generic)References
| Primary Source | Tasmanian Records. |
Claims
No one has claimed Nicholas Kelly yet.
Photos
No photos have been added for Nicholas Kelly.
Convict Notes




Kinnear Indent: Indent Kinnear: https://stors.tas.gov.au/CON14-1-17$init=CON14-1-17P34 and https://stors.tas.gov.au/CON14-1-17$init=CON14-1-17P35




Owen ?, alias N. Kelly, a notorious thief, was for stealing two heifers, the property Mary Kelly, of Ile? was found guilty, sentenced to 10 years transportation Carlow Sentinel, 16 April 1842.




6745. Nicholas Kelly, or Owen Blauch, tried at Carlow, 11 April 1842, 10 years, age 38, height, 5 ft 9 ½, catholic, can read, married, 5 children, 1 on board. Offence: Stealing two heifers, p. Mary Kelly. Once for a cow, 12 months. Proper name, Nicholas Kelly. Surgeon's report: Good. Trade, Pit sawyer, last worked for Mr Keon. Native place, Carlow. Remarks: Son James on board. W, Dorah, at N.P. --------------------------------------------------- Conduct Record: https://stors.tas.gov.au/CON33-1-28$init=CON33-1-28p87 --------------------------------------------------- Supreme Court, Criminal Side, 2 June. James Hayes and Nicholas Kelly were placed at the bar, charged first with forging on the 1st October a certain promissory note for the payment of £10, with intent to defraud George Guy, and secondly, Nicholas Kelly was charged by a second count with feloniously uttering and offering the said note on the 3rd October ; both prisoners having previously pleaded Not Guilty. His Honor took an objection to the information, on the ground, as we understood, that it was not competent to the Court to try both the prisoners at the same time, inasmuch as they were charged with two distinct offences, the forgery being one thing, the uttering another ; in this case there was no analogy between stealing and receiving, as these involved one felonious transaction. The Attorney-General argued in support of the information, referring to, and quoting cases in point from " the books," and the trial proceeded before the following jurors: Messrs, D. M'Gregor (foreman), T. Priest, G. Morton, D. Lewis, D. Barclay, J. Smith, S. Maddocks, R. Rees, H. Dormer, J. T. Cochram, H. Bye, W. Sherwin. The trial occupied the Court from 4 o'clock in the afternoon till 11 at night, when the jury acquitted Hayes of the forgery, and delivered a verdict against Kelly to the effect, that he uttered the note, but not knowing it to be forged. His Honor could not take the verdict in that form, and the jury were locked up for the night under the usual surveillance by the Sheriff's department. SATURDAY, JUNE 3. At the opening of the Court the prisoner Kelly was placed at the bar, and the jury empanelled in the case having taken their seats and answered to their names, returned, through their foreman, Mr. M'Gregor, a verdict of Not Guilty against Kelly, who was discharged. Colonial Times, 6 June 1848.