Summary
Personal Information
Crime
Transportation
Edward Marvell was transported on the Duchess Of Northumberland, departing 1st Oct 1842 and arriving 18th Jan 1843 with 271 passengers.
Duchess Of Northumberland (generic)References
| Primary Source | Australian Joint Copying Project. Microfilm Roll 91, Class and Piece Number HO11/13, Page Number 221 (112) |
| Source Description | This record is one of the entries in the British convict transportation registers 1787-1867 database compiled by State Library of Queensland from British Home Office (HO) records which are available on microfilm as part of the Australian Joint Copying Pro |
| Original Source | Great Britain. Home Office |
| Compiled By | State Library of Queensland |
| Database Source | British convict transportation registers 1787-1867 database |
Claims
No one has claimed Edward Marvell yet.
Photos
No photos have been added for Edward Marvell.
Convict Notes


OATLANDS CIRCUIT. Tuesday, March 27. The Oatlands Criminal Circuit commenced this morning, His Honor Mr. Justice Montague entered the Court, (accompanied by the new Attorney-General, and Mr. Alfred Montague, Barrister,) at ten o'clock. … Benjamin Petthead [should be Pethard], Daniel Fagan, James Ryan, and Edward Margen [Should be Marvell] were then placed at the bar and indicted for having, on the night of the 10th October, feloniously entered the dwelling-house of one James Murphy, of the district of Swanport, and carried away a quantity of flour, pork, sugar, one powder-flask, one coat, two silk handkerchiefs, trousers, &c. … His Honor briefly summed up, and directed the jury to acquit Ryan, as no evidence had been adduced against him. The jury without retiring found three of the prisoners Guilty, and acquitted Ryan. The Court sentenced them to transportation for their natural life. (Cornwall Chronicle Sat 6 Apr 1844, p. 4.)




had been sentenced to transportation for seven years for the crime of larceny, two convictions, at the Bradford Quarter Sessions. Two months later, in the Swansea area, he was found guilty of disorderly conduct and given three days’ solitary confinement. In March, only three months after his arrival, he was tried for the crime of burglary, which involved stealing a coat valued at twelve shillings and other articles of property from the dwelling of James Murphet. This offence is similar to his original offence of stealing clothes in Bradford. He does not seem to have stolen in huge quantities. Both thefts occurred during a cold season, which makes it tempting to consider that he stole clothing to keep warm, but there are too many unknown factors, so I will not give in to that temptation. Marygai Haylar