Summary
Personal Information
Voyage
Transportation
Joseph Metcalf was transported on the Earl Spencer, departing 30th Apr 1813 and arriving 9th Oct 1813 with 203 passengers.
Built 1803, London - Thames, 672 ton required 56 crew and mounted with 16 guns.
Earl Spencer (generic)References
| Primary Source | Australian Joint Copying Project. Microfilm Roll 87, Class and Piece Number HO11/2, Page Number 96 |
| Source Description | This record is one of the entries in the British convict transportation registers 1787-1867 database compiled by State Library of Queensland from British Home Office (HO) records which are available on microfilm as part of the Australian Joint Copying Pro |
| Original Source | Great Britain. Home Office |
| Compiled By | State Library of Queensland |
| Database Source | British convict transportation registers 1787-1867 database |
Claims
No one has claimed Joseph Metcalf yet.
Photos
No photos have been added for Joseph Metcalf.
Convict Notes




Old Bailey: JOSEPH METCALFE. Theft: theft from a specified place. 13th May 1812 Reference Number t18120513-36 Verdict Guilty > with recommendation Sentence Death JOSEPH METCALFE was indicted for feloniously stealing, on the 23d of April, in the dwelling-house of William Barton, one shagreen case, value 2 s. four lancets, value 2 s. one steelyard-beam value 10 s. and a bank note, value 20 l. the property of William Barton. WILLIAM BARTON. I live at No. 14, Mark-lane, in the parish of Allhallows Staining. I am a surgeon. Q. When did this happen - A. On the 23d of April. Q. Are you the sole owner of the house - A. Yes. The prisoner was employed to paint the house. Q. In what part of the house was this case of instruments, and the twenty pound note - A. In the back parlour on the ground floor. Q. Was the bank note in a drawer - A. It was in a drawer in the desk; the desk was locked; I had seen the bank note between ten and eleven o'clock on the evening before; it was then safe. Q. On what time of the day on the 23d did you miss it - A. Between ten and eleven in the morning. The shagreen case was kept in the same desk, and the lancets in the case. The steelyard-beam was in the same room, in another drawer, locked. On missing these things I went to the Bank to stop payment of the note, immediately I missed it. Q. As this desk was locked had the lock been forced by violence, or was it picked - A. I do not know; it was not wrenched open by a crow. Q. Are you quite sure that you had locked the desk when you last saw the desk - A. Yes; I am quite sure I had locked it. Q. As you gave notice to the Bank to stop it, how long was it afterwards that you heard of it - A. It was stopped at the Bank the first day I missed it. I went to the Bank between eleven and twelve in the morning. Q. When did you see the note again - A. I do not recollect how soon afterwards. I had no particular mark of my own to know the note by. I had the bank note at Sir William Curtis 's bank; I think I received it on the 27th of March. The prisoner continued at the house at his work. I sent for a constable. The prisoner was searched; I believe they found nothing on him. I afterwards went with the constable to the prisoner's house; the prisoner went with us; the lancet-case, and the steelyard-beam we found at the prisoner's house. Q. Did the prisoner at all account for their being in his house - A. I think he said they belonged to some one else. The lancet-case he said belonged to some one else. I am sure the steelyard-beam and the lancet-case are my property. WILLIAM BRAND I am one of the marshalmen. I was sent for to take charge of the prisoner at Mr. Barton's house; I found the prisoner at work there, painting. I told the prisoner that I had a very unpleasant circumstance to relate to him, that Mr. Barton was suspicious that he had taken a twenty pound note out of his desk. The prisoner said he knew nothing of it. I told him I must search him. I did search him, and found nothing upon him of consequence but a key; I asked him what key that was; he said, it was the key of the door; I told him I must search his apartment; I took him with me, and went to the room in Camomile Mews. I opened the door with that key. Q. Was any body there - A. No one. There was nobody in the room when we entered it; his wife was not at home. I then proceeded to search. The first thing I searched was a chest of drawers, or a bureau; the first thing I found, that Mr. Barton identified, was a case of instruments, which I produce; he claimed it, and he said it was in the desk where the money was. I then found a pocket-book in the same drawer, it contained ten one-pound bank notes. I enquired of the prisoner, before that time, if he had any money in the house; he said he had a little. Upon looking at them notes I found each note had a particular stamp at the back, as if they all came from one person. I said to Mr. Barton, I am satisfied that this is part of the property; he has changed the note. The prisoner said nothing. We then proceeded to search further, and in a deal box, not locked, lay the steelyard-beam; Mr. Barton identified it. I then asked the prisoner, whose box it was; he said it was either his brother-in-law's, or a relation's; I cannot say which, but I think, a brother-in-law's. I found nothing more until his wife came in, when we had nearly closed the search. I ceased from searching, and began to look at her; the prisoner was standing by; I asked her if she had got any money in the house; she said she did not know of any, except a trifle that she had in her pocket, a three-shilling piece, and a eighteen-penny piece, and a trifle of silver. I found by the receipts that they had paid away, from Saturday night before, several pounds. I asked her what money her husband brought her home on Saturday night; she said, a guinea and a half. This was the Thursday. I told her I found by the receipts I had in my hand that they had paid away more money than that; she said, that was accounted for by a pound note she had saved up previous; but that did not account for the whole of the money. I then asked her if she had not got some money in her pocket; she said no, only that trifle of silver. I told her to empty her pockets; she did, and pulled out this pocket-book, and in the pocketbook was ten one-pound notes, that makes twenty one-pound notes found in the house; they were all bank notes. Upon examining the notes, I found they answered with the description of the stamp that the others had; they were all stamped. I then asked her how she came by them; she said she had them from her mother, as she was with child, and an expensive time was coming on. I told her I was satisfied how she came by them, and asked her where she had changed the twenty pound note; she said, at the bank that morning. Q. Her husband heard all this, did he - A. Yes. I then asked her of whom she had the twenty pound note; she hesitated a moment, and said, I must say my husband; he made no reply. I asked him how he came to do so; he said he had an expensive time coming on; he had been out of work some time, and he took it to carry him through his expences. Q. Did you go to the Bank afterwards - A. I did not; the prosecutor did. Q. Did the wife appear to be far advanced in her pregnancy - A. Very near her time. JOHN HALSE. I am a clerk in the Bank. Q. Did you change a twenty pound note with any person on the 23d of April - A. A person of the name of Thompson changed a twenty pound note. I cannot say whether it was a man or a woman. Q. What number was it - A. I have only the entries of the numbers which were given for the twenty pound note. When I changed it I entered the number of the notes for which it was paid. The party who changed that note had twenty single one-pound notes. I saw the twenty one-pound notes before the Lord Mayor, and they corresponded with the notes I gave for the twenty pound note; their numbers are, 57,758, 28th of September; 18th of February, 38,657; 3d of March, 7,079; there is two of that date; the other is 75,229: 29th of February, 33,150. COURT. Hand the notes to the Jury while you read the entries, for the Jury to see if they correspond - A. 29th of February again, 33,725; 29th again, 40,714; 7th of March, 44,740; 7th of March, 44,739; 9th of March, 37,794; 15th of February, 3,025; 5th of March, 20,368; 29th of February, 58,209; 3d of March, 47,906; 20th of January, 4,752; 18th of February, 3,887; 6th of February, 4,894; 4th of February, 33,993; 15th of February, 37,422; 24th of February, 40,001; making in the whole twenty one-pound notes. I only know the note by the name. The twenty pound note is in the custody of Mr. King. I neither knew the number or date of the twenty pound note. We have the name and residence of every note we change. I only know the twenty pound note by the name of Thompson; I have no doubt it is the identical note for which I gave the person them twenty one-pound notes. I only entered the name. We ask the name, and the name they give we enter in the book; there is no other entry of a twenty pound note with the name of Thompson upon it on that day. WILLIAM BLACKSTONE. I come from the banking-house of Messrs. Robarts and Curtis. THOMAS KING. I produce the twenty pound note from off the file at the Bank. Q. to Blackstone. Do you know whether that note ever went from your house to Mr. Barton - A. A twenty pound note of the same number went to Mr. Barton. Q. Then it must be the same note. There are never two notes of the same number and date - A. Not as far as I know. I paid the note, No. 6,244, on the 26th of March, to a check of Thomas Dobson 's, in part of payment. Mr. Knapp. I understand you, you paid that note in part of payment, to whom - A. That I cannot say. The check was drawn upon our house by Thomas Dobson . Q. to Mr. Barton. You said you had that note on the 26th of March, how did you receive the note - A. I received a twenty pound note, and a twenty-five pound note of this gentleman at Messrs. Robarts and Curtis's. I have received drafts there before drawn by Mr. Dobson. I did not receive any other on that day. Prosecutor. The steelyard-beam is mine, and the lancets and case are mine. The prisoner left his defence to his counsel; called five witnesses, who gave him a good character. GUILTY - DEATH , aged 27. [ The prisoner was recommended to mercy by the Jury on account of his former good character .] _____________________ Jospeh Metcalf was listed as 30 years old on arrival. Native Place: Cambridge. Occupation: House painter. Joseph was 5'8¼" tall, fair pale complexion, brown hair and eyes. 17/6/1829: Convict Death Register - Joseph Metcalf died, aged 48, at Parramatta.




Old Bailey Proceedings Online (www.oldbaileyonline.org, version 8.0, 12 August 2020), May 1812, trial of JOSEPH METCALFE (t18120513-36). JOSEPH METCALFE, Theft > theft from a specified place, 13th May 1812. 464. JOSEPH METCALFE was indicted for feloniously stealing, on the 23d of April , in the dwelling-house of William Barton, one shagreen case, value 2 s. four lancets, value 2 s. one steelyard-beam value 10 s. and a bank note, value 20 l. the property of William Barton . WILLIAM BARTON . I live at No. 14, Mark-lane, in the parish of Allhallows Staining . I am a surgeon . Q. When did this happen - A. On the 23d of April. Q. Are you the sole owner of the house - A. Yes. The prisoner was employed to paint the house . Q. In what part of the house was this case of instruments, and the twenty pound note - A. In the back parlour on the ground floor. Q. Was the bank note in a drawer - A. It was in a drawer in the desk; the desk was locked; I had seen the bank note between ten and eleven o'clock on the evening before; it was then safe. Q. On what time of the day on the 23d did you miss it - A. Between ten and eleven in the morning. The shagreen case was kept in the same desk, and the lancets in the case. The steelyard-beam was in the same room, in another drawer, locked. On missing these things I went to the Bank to stop payment of the note, immediately I missed it. Q. As this desk was locked had the lock been forced by violence, or was it picked - A. I do not know; it was not wrenched open by a crow. Q. Are you quite sure that you had locked the desk when you last saw the desk - A. Yes; I am quite sure I had locked it. Q. As you gave notice to the Bank to stop it, how long was it afterwards that you heard of it - A. It was stopped at the Bank the first day I missed it. I went to the Bank between eleven and twelve in the morning. Q. When did you see the note again - A. I do not recollect how soon afterwards. I had no particular mark of my own to know the note by. I had the bank note at Sir William Curtis 's bank; I think I received it on the 27th of March. The prisoner continued at the house at his work. I sent for a constable. The prisoner was searched; I believe they found nothing on him. I afterwards went with the constable to the prisoner's house; the prisoner went with us; the lancet-case, and the steelyard-beam we found at the prisoner's house. Q. Did the prisoner at all account for their being in his house - A. I think he said they belonged to some one else. The lancet-case he said belonged to some one else. I am sure the steelyard-beam and the lancet-case are my property. WILLIAM BRAND . I am one of the marshalmen. I was sent for to take charge of the prisoner at Mr. Barton's house; I found the prisoner at work there, painting. I told the prisoner that I had a very unpleasant circumstance to relate to him, that Mr. Barton was suspicious that he had taken a twenty pound note out of his desk. The prisoner said he knew nothing of it. I told him I must search him. I did search him, and found nothing upon him of consequence but a key; I asked him what key that was; he said, it was the key of the door; I told him I must search his apartment; I took him with me, and went to the room in Camomile Mews. I opened the door with that key. Q. Was any body there - A. No one. There was nobody in the room when we entered it; his wife was not at home. I then proceeded to search. The first thing I searched was a chest of drawers, or a bureau; the first thing I found, that Mr. Barton identified, was a case of instruments, which I produce; he claimed it, and he said it was in the desk where the money was. I then found a pocket-book in the same drawer, it contained ten one-pound bank notes. I enquired of the prisoner, before that time, if he had any money in the house; he said he had a little. Upon looking at them notes I found each note had a particular stamp at the back, as if they all came from one person. I said to Mr. Barton, I am satisfied that this is part of the property; he has changed the note. The prisoner said nothing. We then proceeded to search further, and in a deal box, not locked, lay the steelyard-beam; Mr. Barton identified it. I then asked the prisoner, whose box it was; he said it was either his brother-in-law's, or a relation's; I cannot say which, but I think, a brother-in-law's. I found nothing more until his wife came in, when we had nearly closed the search. I ceased from searching, and began to look at her; the prisoner was standing by; I asked her if she had got any money in the house; she said she did not know of any, except a trifle that she had in her pocket, a three-shilling piece, and a eighteen-penny piece, and a trifle of silver. I found by the receipts that they had paid away, from Saturday night before, several pounds. I asked her what money her husband brought her home on Saturday night; she said, a guinea and a half. This was the Thursday. I told her I found by the receipts I had in my hand that they had paid away more money than that; she said, that was accounted for by a pound note she had saved up previous; but that did not account for the whole of the money. I then asked her if she had not got some money in her pocket; she said no, only that trifle of silver. I told her to empty her pockets; she did, and pulled out this pocket-book, and in the pocketbook was ten one-pound notes, that makes twenty one-pound notes found in the house; they were all bank notes. Upon examining the notes, I found they answered with the description of the stamp that the others had; they were all stamped. I then asked her how she came by them; she said she had them from her mother, as she was with child, and an expensive time was coming on. I told her I was satisfied how she came by them, and asked her where she had changed the twenty pound note; she said, at the bank that morning. Q. Her husband heard all this, did he - A. Yes. I then asked her of whom she had the twenty pound note; she hesitated a moment, and said, I must say my husband; he made no reply. I asked him how he came to do so; he said he had an expensive time coming on; he had been out of work some time, and he took it to carry him through his expences. Q. Did you go to the Bank afterwards - A. I did not; the prosecutor did. Q. Did the wife appear to be far advanced in her pregnancy - A. Very near her time. JOHN HALSE . I am a clerk in the Bank. Q. Did you change a twenty pound note with any person on the 23d of April - A. A person of the name of Thompson changed a twenty pound note. I cannot say whether it was a man or a woman. Q. What number was it - A. I have only the entries of the numbers which were given for the twenty pound note. When I changed it I entered the number of the notes for which it was paid. The party who changed that note had twenty single one-pound notes. I saw the twenty one-pound notes before the Lord Mayor, and they corresponded with the notes I gave for the twenty pound note; their numbers are, 57,758, 28th of September; 18th of February, 38,657; 3d of March, 7,079; there is two of that date; the other is 75,229: 29th of February, 33,150. COURT. Hand the notes to the Jury while you read the entries, for the Jury to see if they correspond - A. 29th of February again, 33,725; 29th again, 40,714; 7th of March, 44,740; 7th of March, 44,739; 9th of March, 37,794; 15th of February, 3,025; 5th of March, 20,368; 29th of February, 58,209; 3d of March, 47,906; 20th of January, 4,752; 18th of February, 3,887; 6th of February, 4,894; 4th of February, 33,993; 15th of February, 37,422; 24th of February, 40,001; making in the whole twenty one-pound notes. I only know the note by the name. The twenty pound note is in the custody of Mr. King. I neither knew the number or date of the twenty pound note. We have the name and residence of every note we change. I only know the twenty pound note by the name of Thompson; I have no doubt it is the identical note for which I gave the person them twenty one-pound notes. I only entered the name. We ask the name, and the name they give we enter in the book; there is no other entry of a twenty pound note with the name of Thompson upon it on that day. WILLIAM BLACKSTONE . I come from the banking-house of Messrs. Robarts and Curtis. THOMAS KING . I produce the twenty pound note from off the file at the Bank. Q. to Blackstone. Do you know whether that note ever went from your house to Mr. Barton - A. A twenty pound note of the same number went to Mr. Barton. Q. Then it must be the same note. There are never two notes of the same number and date - A. Not as far as I know. I paid the note, No. 6,244, on the 26th of March, to a check of Thomas Dobson 's, in part of payment. Mr. Knapp. I understand you, you paid that note in part of payment, to whom - A. That I cannot say. The check was drawn upon our house by Thomas Dobson . Q. to Mr. Barton. You said you had that note on the 26th of March, how did you receive the note - A. I received a twenty pound note, and a twenty-five pound note of this gentleman at Messrs. Robarts and Curtis's. I have received drafts there before drawn by Mr. Dobson. I did not receive any other on that day. Prosecutor. The steelyard-beam is mine, and the lancets and case are mine. The prisoner left his defence to his counsel; called five witnesses, who gave him a good character. GUILTY - DEATH , aged 27. [ The prisoner was recommended to mercy by the Jury on account of his former good character .] London jury, before Mr. Common Serjeant. --------------------------------------------------- This entry in the Index to the NSW 1828 census may be Joseph Metcalf: J. Metcalf, Earl Spencer, at Hyde Park Barracks, Sydney. (No further details)




TICKETS OF LEAVE, CANCELLED. Earl Spencer — Joseph Metcalf, for cohabiting with another man's wife. The Australian Sydney) 26 July 1826.