Summary
Personal Information
Voyage
Transportation
Charles Osborne was transported on the Waterloo, departing 18th Dec 1830 and arriving 30th Apr 1831 with 200 passengers.
1829 - Waterloo's first voyage arrived at Sydney Cove 9 July 1829. 180 Male Convicts. 2 Died on voyage. 7 sent to the hospital on landing. Total mustered; 171. Stephen Addison - Commander Michael Goodsire - Surgeon Superintendent [His wife was a passenger] 1842 - The Waterloo voyage of 1842 was wrecked on 28/8/1842. 189 people drowned, these being 143 convicts, 15 men of the 99th Regiment, together with 17 wives and children, the boatswain Mr. Chiverton, the sailmaker, the carpenter and 11 of the crew. Convicts were then received in Cape Town Prison from the wreck of the Waterloo, 2nd September 1842. They then completed their voyage to VDL per “Cape Packet” which arrived on 23/11/1842.
WaterlooReferences
| Primary Source | Irish Convict Database, by Peter Mayberry. |
Claims
No one has claimed Charles Osborne yet.
Photos
No photos have been added for Charles Osborne.
Convict Notes




CAUTION TO MERCHANTS AND TRADERS IN DUBLIN. Systematic Thievery. —The King, at the prosecution of William Andrews, against Charles Osborne and Thomas Osborne. The prisoner, Charles Osborne, was indicted for stealing two yards of cloth, the property of Mr. Andrews and the other prisoner for receiving same, knowing it to be stolen. Mr. Finlay stated the case most ably. appeared that the prosecutor was Mr. William Andrew, the highly respectable proprietor of the Irish Woollen Warehouse in Castle-street, and the prisoner, Charles Osborne, was a messenger or porter in his employment (or upwards of nine years. It was his duty to fold up parcels of goods sold, be delivered by the street messengers, and occasionally betook directions of where they were to be sent, and labelled them accordingly for delivery; his salary was 12s. a week. The other prisoner, Thomas, was his brother, and a shoe maker by trade. It was for some time suspected that he was not conducting himself honestly, as he used to be attired, after hours of business were over, in the most fashionable clothes; had an elegant watch, gold chain and seals, and altogether was a dandy of the first water. On Sundays used to ride a fine horse, frequented taverns and such places, where he passed himself off as a salesman to the Irish Woollen Warehouse, having a commission on all the sales he might make, and took unlimited orders accordingly. He, however, continued to elude all vigilance, until an accidental circumstance took place which led to the discovery of the system of plunder which he had carried on successfully for upwards of twelve months. Mr. Finlay, next entered into the facts of the case as detailed in evidence. James Taggart, a porter in the Irish Woollen Warehouse, being sworn, said —On the 30th of July I saw the prisoner, Charles Osborne, remove a remnant of blue cloth, containing about one yard and a quarter, from the lower to the long wareroom, and leave it in a recess—this was not where such pieces were kept—l intended to watch the prisoner, but was called away on other business—on my return I found the prisoner standing near where the cloth was —he stooped under the counter and went away I then searched for the cloth, but could not find it—before it was removed I saw the prisoner write a label for a parcel, directed to Mr. Fortescue, Mr. Armstrong’s, Wormwood gate”—in the course of the day …. …. The Recorder briefly recapitulated the evidence, and the Jury, without hesitation, found the prisoner, Charles Osborne, guilty. There was no evidence produced against the other prisoner, he was accordingly acquitted. Before he Recorder pronounced sentence, his Lordship called on Mr. Barrington to know what was the probable extent of the robbery committed. Mr. Barrington said, that in all there were not less than ninety four parcels ascertained to have been sent out, within the last 12 months! from Mr. Andrews’ warehouse by the prisoner, to different public-houses and tailoring establishments, where he was in the habit of calling or sending for them. Mr. Andrews (he said) could not have lost less than three hundred pounds on an average. The Recorder then proceeded to pass sentence. His Lordship dwelt particularly on the enormity of the prisoner’s crime, aggravated, as was, the systematic manner in which it was so long carried on. Three other bills of indictment had been found against him for similar offences. The severity of the law was not visited upon him so much for the crime, as that his fate might serve as a warning for others holding like situations, and for the general good of the public. His Lordship felt the Court would not be doing its duty to the country if the prisoner was not sent out of it. The sentence of the Court therefore was, that he be transported beyond the seas for the term of seven years. Saunders’s News-Letter. 10 Sep 1830.




Irish Convict Database, by Peter Mayberry. Charles Osborne, age on arrival, 21, per Waterloo (2) 1831. Tried 1830, at Dublin, 7 years, for Embezzlement. DOB, 1810. Native place, Newry Down Co. Single. Protestant. Clerk.