Contribute to this record
Vincenzo Bucchieri, one of 200 convicts transported on the Guilford [Guildford], August 1811
Name, Aliases & Gender
Birth, Occupation & Death
|Date of Birth:
|Date of Death:
||27th October, 1842
life span was 61 years*
* Median life span based on contributions
Conviction & Transportation
* Arrival date is estimated
Sentenced to Life
||Australian Joint Copying Project. Microfilm Roll 87, Class and Piece Number HO11/2, Page Number 54
||This record is one of the entries in the British convict transportation registers 1787-1867 database compiled by State Library of Queensland from British Home Office (HO) records which are available on microfilm as part of the Australian Joint Copying Project.
Did you find the person you were looking for?
If Vincenzo Bucchieri was the person you were looking for, you may be able to discover more about them by looking at our resources page.
If you have more hunting to do, try a new search or browse the convict records.
Mike on 16th October, 2014 wrote:
Born in Sicily
Died 27 Oct 1842, Hobart, Tasmania
D Wong on 18th October, 2014 wrote:
Vincenzo Bucchieri was transported for ‘Desertion’ and arrived in NSW on the Guildford 1812. He was then sent to VDL and arrived there per ‘Ruby’ 19/2/1812.
Vencenzo was 30 years old, 5’8” tall, sallow complexion, hazel eyes, black hair.
BUCCHIERI, Vincenzo. Per “Guildford”, 1812
1822 Sep 18: On list of convicts in Van Diemen’s Land, as called for by Lieutenant Governor Sorell (Reel 6009; 4/3506 p.297)
1826: Married Mary Foley. They had been living together and already had 6 children.
1830-1832: Assigned to his wife.
2/4/1833: Colonial Conviction, Hobart – “Receiving 640lbs., of Barley. The property of the Government, knowing it to be stolen”.
1833: Transported to Port Arthur.
1835: Public Works
29/10/1842: Inquest of his death: Died of water on the chest – Natural death.
The Inquest paper was signed by his daughter Harriet.
This is from a paper by Lucy Frost:
Protecting the Children: Early Years of the King’s Orphan Schools in Van
On 16 May 1833, the Committee considered the petition for a ‘distraught & destitute family’ whose father had been sent to Port Arthur after his conviction for receiving 614 pounds of barley, the property of the Crown, knowing it to be stolen. For this theft from ‘our sovereign Lord the King’, Vizenza Buccheri was sentenced to seven years’ transportation.
Buccheri and his wife Mary Foley were among the colony’s earliest convicts. Before female transports began sailing directly to Van Diemen’s Land, Mary had been sent from Dublin to Sydney and then on to Hobart, arriving in 1817. Sentenced to seven years’ transportation in 1815, she was free by 1824, two years before she married Buccheri, with whom she had been living for most of her time as a prisoner.
Buccheri, a Sicilian by birth, was illiterate and never learned to speak English very well, but in these years before Arthur arrived to regulate the convict system, he managed to purchase a cart and four working bullocks, the source of support for his growing
family—ten children were born to the convict couple, though three at least died quite early.
Buccheri had an unusual background. He had been a private in a Sicilian regiment serving with the British when he deserted in Malta, was caught, tried by a court martial in 1809, sentenced to transportation for life — and then sent to London to be put on the ship which would take him to the ends of the earth. In 1814 he participated in a bold attempt to escape the penal island, and might have succeeded in making it to South America with his co-conspirators if they had paid as much attention to their water casks as to the boat they built.
Almost twenty years later, his conviction for receiving the stolen barley looks like another wild scheme gone wrong.
It certainly left his children unprotected. The Committee of Management recorded finding them in a most neglected state, some of the children almost blind’. Rev Bedford had performed the marriage ceremony for the parents in 1826 after they had six children, only three of them living, and had been concerned about the abject poverty of this family ever since.
Now that their father was locked up, he arranged for all the children to be removed from their home to the hospital. ‘The eldest a girl of 11 years of age of most abandoned habits has been sent to the Female Factory’. Suddenly, by despatching an 11-year-old girl to a women’s prison, the concept of ‘protection’ turns darker.
Some sort of struggle may have ensued between the impoverished mother and the determined clergyman, because even though the Committee agreed to admit 6 year old Harriet and 4 year old Thomas in May 1833, the children did not actually go on the record books until late November, six months later. Their oldes sister, Elizabeth, managed to get out of the Female Factory and into the Orphan School the following February. At least two children were still at home, baby Agnes and the blind Mary Ann; in June 1836 they also entered the Orphan School.
Getting out was not easy. On 30 June 1838, after Buccheri had returned from Port Arthur and was granted a ticket of leave to live in New Norfolk, he retrieved his eldest daughter Elizabeth who was now 16 and could be sent out to work. The next year, Thomas, aged 10, absconded and never returned to the Orphan School. In 1841, Buccheri retrieved his youngest child, Agnes, perhaps a sentimental favourite. In 1842 Harriet, after almost nine years in the institution, was apprenticed. Now all the siblings were gone except the blind Mary Ann, who faced another ten years in the Orphan Schools before she was removed to the infirmary, Hobart, aged almost 30.
Convict Changes History
Mike on 16th October, 2014 made the following changes:
D Wong on 18th October, 2014 made the following changes:
date of birth: 1780 (prev. 0000), date of death: 27th October, 1842 (prev. 0000), occupation, crime